DatabaseCategoriesServicesCountriesArticlesNewsletterRequest listing
← Back to Bitpanda
Alternatives

Alternatives to Bitpanda

Explore 12 European fintech companies similar to Bitpanda — operating in Embedded Finance and Wealth and Capital Markets.

You're looking for alternatives to:
Bitpanda
Bitpanda
Embedded FinanceWealthCapital MarketsCrypto & Blockchain
🇦🇹 Austria
Eric Demuth, Paul Klanschek and Christian Trummer founded Bitpanda in Vienna in 2014, at a point when running a crypto business meant operating in a regulatory vacuum and most competitors treated that vacuum as an opportunity. Bitpanda treated it as a temporary condition. The strategic bet — that crypto would eventually be regulated, and that the platforms holding licences when it happened would inherit the market — took a decade to pay off, and shaped everything about how the company was built. The product today is broader than crypto and deliberately so. A single Bitpanda login covers more than 600 cryptocurrencies in real custody, around 10,000 stocks and ETFs at a flat €1 per order since January 2026, four physical precious metals, and automated savings plans, with first purchases possible from as little as a euro. That multi-asset structure is the strategic differentiator against pure crypto exchanges: it positions Bitpanda as a general-purpose retail investment platform that happens to have started in crypto, competing as much with Trade Republic and Scalable Capital as with Coinbase. Growth has been steady rather than explosive — one million users in 2019, four million by 2023, six million by the end of 2024, and past seven million since. The licensing record is the company's core asset. Demuth's claim that Bitpanda held more than ten licences and registrations before MiCA even existed is borne out by the sequence that followed: in January 2025 it became the first major crypto platform to receive a full MiCA licence, granted by Germany's BaFin, followed by authorisations from Malta and from Austria's own FMA in April 2025 — three regulators in three countries. Demuth was pointed at the time about the distinction between a licence with immediate validity and the "in-principle" approvals competitors were announcing. That regulatory standing also underpins a second business: Bitpanda Technology Solutions, the white-label arm that supplies infrastructure to banks, and which was reported in 2025 as a partner in Deutsche Bank's long-delayed crypto custody service alongside Taurus. Which makes August 2026 an awkward footnote. Austria's FMA fined Bitpanda GmbH €70,000 — the first legally binding MiCA penalty the regulator has published anywhere in the EU. The breaches were procedural rather than harmful: failing to submit a crypto-asset white paper the required twenty working days before publication, circulating a marketing communication before the white paper was published, and omitting required disclosures from that communication. Bitpanda said the findings concerned timing and formal specifications rather than customer harm, that it had coordinated the process with the FMA, and that it resolved the matter quickly. The regulator, for its part, noted pointedly that being the first published MiCA case confers no special status on the firm involved. The sum is trivial for a company of this size; the significance is that MiCA has moved from licensing into enforcement, and the first published example landed on the platform that has campaigned hardest on being the most regulated in Europe. The honest read is that Bitpanda's positioning is both genuine and commercially motivated, and that both things can be true. Building a licensed, multi-asset, retail-first platform from Vienna while competitors chased offshore jurisdictions was a real strategic choice with real costs, and MiCA has vindicated it — every crypto platform serving EU customers now needs what Bitpanda spent ten years acquiring. The open questions are ordinary ones: whether a company generating revenue in the low hundreds of millions can defend a retail market against neobrokers with banking licences moving into crypto from the other direction, and whether the reported preparations for a public listing arrive in a window that values the regulatory moat properly. Sponsorships of Arsenal and other sports properties suggest a company spending to build brand ahead of something.
Founded 2014
View full profile →

12 alternatives to Bitpanda

Sorted by similarity and popularity
Anaxago
Anaxago
Embedded FinanceWealth
🇫🇷 France
Anaxago is a European investment platform that democratizes access to private market deals, letting retail investors back startups and SMEs that would normally require deep pockets and insider connections. The platform sidesteps the gatekeeping that has long defined venture capital, offering curated equity stakes in growth-stage companies across tech, real estate, and other sectors. Founded in 2014, it operates across multiple European markets and has processed hundreds of millions in investments, positioning itself as a bridge between ambitious entrepreneurs and everyday investors seeking portfolio diversification beyond public markets. What sets Anaxago apart is its focus on transparency and accessibility. Rather than opaque fund structures or minimum investment requirements that exclude ordinary savers, it lets users invest from relatively modest amounts while maintaining rigorous due diligence on every deal. The platform handles the mechanics of investment management, shareholder rights, and secondary market liquidity—functions that typically require armies of lawyers and compliance teams. It's part of a broader shift toward democratized finance, where technology makes previously exclusive opportunities available to anyone with capital and appetite for risk. In the European fintech landscape, where crowdfunding and alternative investment platforms have proliferated, Anaxago has carved out credibility through regulatory compliance, deal flow quality, and a genuine commitment to investor protection. It represents how fintech can unbundle traditional wealth management, making private market exposure a normal part of retail investing rather than a privilege reserved for the wealthy.
Founded 2014
View profile →
MoonPay
MoonPay
Embedded FinanceCrypto & Blockchain
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
MoonPay sits at the intersection of crypto and traditional finance, offering on and off-ramps that let people move money between their bank account and crypto wallets with minimal friction. Founded in 2018, the London-based company has quietly become one of Europe's most important infrastructure plays in the emerging crypto economy, handling billions in transactions across more than 150 countries. What sets MoonPay apart is its unglamorous but essential positioning: it's not trying to be a crypto exchange or a trading platform. Instead, it's the plumbing layer that makes crypto accessible to ordinary people. You buy crypto through MoonPay the same way you'd buy a digital service—seamless, compliant, and fast. The company operates with full EU regulation, holding licenses across multiple jurisdictions while maintaining the kind of compliance rigor that traditional banks expect. MoonPay's API-first approach means startups, wallets, and even traditional fintech apps can embed crypto purchasing directly into their user experience. This white-label capability has attracted partnerships with everyone from music platforms to gaming studios. The company has raised substantial funding and is valued at over a billion dollars, a testament to how critical crypto infrastructure has become. In a market obsessed with trading speculation and yield farming, MoonPay represents something more fundamental: the normalization of crypto as a payment asset class. It's doing for cryptocurrency what Stripe did for online payments—removing the technical and regulatory barriers that kept it confined to specialists.
Founded 2018
View profile →
Vivid Money
Vivid Money
WealthDigital BankingCrypto & BlockchainPersonal Finance
🇩🇪 Germany
Vivid Money is a Berlin-based fintech that collapsed the traditional distinction between banking, investing, and spending into a single mobile-first experience. Launched in 2020, it positioned itself as the European answer to all-in-one financial apps—a place where you could manage your checking account, invest in fractional shares and crypto, and pay with virtual cards, all without leaving the app. The platform built its early reputation on speed and accessibility. Account opening took minutes rather than days. The investment side felt more like TradingView-for-consumers than stuffy wealth management. Virtual card creation was instantaneous, and the app's design sensibility leaned toward the minimalist and modern rather than corporate banking's beige aesthetic. Vivid positioned itself against traditional banks' glacial pace and regulatory burden, while also differentiating from pure-play neobanks that didn't offer investing. It moved quickly to add crypto features when the market demanded them, and secured backing from tier-one investors who believed in the all-in-one thesis. However, the company faced headwinds from regulatory tightening around crypto and the broader fintech funding winter. In late 2024, reports emerged of operational restructuring and potential insolvency, marking a sobering turn for what had been one of Europe's most closely watched fintech challengers. Vivid's arc—from breakthrough disruptor to distressed turnaround—reflects the volatility of the European fintech landscape and the challenge of building a diversified financial platform without institutional heritage or captive customer bases.
Founded 2020
View profile →
finleap
finleap
Embedded FinanceFinancial InfrastructureWealthPaymentsDigital BankingLending
🇩🇪 Germany
finleap is Berlin's answer to a question the European fintech scene keeps asking: how do you build world-class financial companies at scale? Rather than chase unicorn valuations, finleap builds them. The holding company operates as a fintech factory, incubating and scaling financial startups from day one with institutional backing, operational expertise, and a network that spans regulators, banks, and investors across the continent. What sets finleap apart is the architecture itself. It's not an accelerator or a VC fund—it's a purpose-built engine for creating and nurturing fintech companies. Each portfolio company gets access to finleap's infrastructure, compliance playbooks, and go-to-market templates, which compresses timelines and eliminates the friction that typically derails early-stage fintechs. The model works: companies like Wayfair-backed Finn, B2B payments platform Foxpay, and lending marketplace Evala have all emerged from the finleap stable. Internally, finleap operates across payments, lending, wealth, and embedded finance—categories where the European market remains genuinely underpenetrated compared to the US. The company's thesis is straightforward: identify white space in financial services, build products faster than traditional banks can move, and create defensible market positions through technology and user experience. It's less about disruption theater and more about pragmatic value creation. Finleap sits at an interesting intersection in the European fintech landscape: large enough to command resources and regulatory relationships, independent enough to move quickly, and structured in a way that lets founders maintain autonomy while tapping institutional muscle. For a continent that produces good fintech companies but struggles with scaling, finleap represents a new playbook.
Founded 2014
View profile →
Revolut
Revolut
WealthPaymentsDigital BankingPersonal Finance
🇱🇹 Lithuania
Nik Storonsky was born in Dolgoprudny, Russia, and moved to London in 2006 to work as an equity derivatives trader, first at Lehman Brothers and later at Credit Suisse. Vlad Yatsenko was a software engineer who'd spent years building financial systems. In 2015 they sat down and asked a question that should have occurred to banks years earlier: why does spending money abroad still cost so much? The answer they built was Revolut — initially a prepaid card with no foreign exchange fees, then a multi-currency account, then a trading platform, then an insurance product, then a business banking offering, then something that's increasingly hard to describe as anything other than a full financial operating system. Revolut didn't unbundle banking so much as rebuild it from scratch for people who found the existing version frustrating and expensive. The numbers now are genuinely striking for a company that started with two people and a card. Revenue reached £4.5 billion in 2025, up 46% year on year, with pre-tax profit rising 57% to £1.7 billion. The customer base has passed 75 million retail users, plus 767,000 businesses. The company employs more than 12,000 people and operates in more than 40 markets. In July 2026, a secondary share sale valued Revolut at $115 billion — up from $75 billion just eight months earlier, and more than the market capitalisation of Barclays. It remains Europe's most valuable private technology company by a wide margin. The milestone that mattered most arrived in March 2026: a full UK banking licence from the Prudential Regulation Authority, ending a five-year application process that had become one of the most-watched regulatory sagas in European fintech. The licence means Revolut can now protect UK deposits up to £120,000, offer authorised consumer credit, and compete directly with high street banks for mortgage and lending business. It's the piece that transforms Revolut from a very successful payments app into a regulated bank. The global licensing map is filling in quickly, with one persistent gap. In July 2026 Revolut became the first global fintech granted a full Australian Deposit-taking Institution licence by APRA — a regulator whose capital requirements have defeated several domestic neobanks — and launched Revolut Bank Australia. In August it secured a French banking licence, a significant step given that France is its largest European market outside the UK and that holding a local licence rather than passporting from Lithuania changes how it can compete there on lending and deposits. It has also opened its first bank outside Europe, in Mexico. The exception is the United States, where a banking charter application filed in 2024 remains pending — in a period when the OCC has rejected applications from both Wise and bunq. Around the licences, the product keeps widening past banking: private markets access for European retail customers through funds from Apollo, Ares and Partners Group; a partnership with OpenAI bringing ChatGPT Go to premium tiers; eSIM data plans; and an airport lounge network starting in Copenhagen. The original thesis — that banking could be cheaper, faster, and simpler — hasn't changed. What has changed is that Revolut is no longer only selling banking.
Founded 2015
View profile →
Adyen
Adyen
Embedded FinancePayments
🇳🇱 Netherlands
Pieter van der Does and Arnout Schuijff had already built and sold one payments company when they sat down in 2006 to start again. The result was Adyen — the name literally means "start over" in Surinamese — and the premise was simple: instead of stitching together the same fragmented payment infrastructure everyone else was using, they would build the whole thing themselves from scratch. That decision, made in an Amsterdam office nearly two decades ago, is still the reason Adyen is different. Most payment companies are assemblers — they buy a gateway here, a processor there, bolt them together and hope for the best. Adyen owns its own technology stack end to end, which means a merchant integrating once gets access to card processing, local payment methods, point-of-sale terminals, and real-time settlement data through a single platform. No middle layers, no reconciliation headaches, no finger-pointing between vendors when something breaks. The client list tells you everything about where Adyen sits in the market. McDonald's, Spotify, Microsoft, LVMH, H&M — these are companies with serious payment volumes and zero appetite for systems that don't work. Adyen became the default choice for enterprises that had outgrown the limitations of traditional payment stacks and needed something that could handle global scale without buckling. Since going public on Euronext Amsterdam in 2018, Adyen has grown into one of Europe's most valuable technology companies, with around 4,300 employees across 23 countries and net revenue of just under €2 billion in 2024. It remains headquartered in Amsterdam and consistently profitable — a combination that's rarer in fintech than it should be. For businesses that treat payments as infrastructure rather than an afterthought, Adyen is the benchmark everything else gets measured against.
Founded 2006
View profile →
Klarna
Klarna
Embedded FinancePaymentsDigital BankingBNPL
🇸🇪 Sweden
Three Stockholm School of Economics students pitched an idea at a university entrepreneurship competition in 2005: let shoppers receive goods before they pay, and put the credit risk on the merchant side. The pitch finished last. They built it anyway. Sebastian Siemiatkowski, Niklas Adalberth, and Victor Jacobsson launched what was originally called Kreditor, later renamed Klarna, and spent the next two decades turning that rejected idea into one of Europe's most recognised fintech brands. The core insight held up: millions of people would rather split a purchase into three instalments than reach for a credit card, and merchants would pay for the privilege of offering that option because it reduces cart abandonment and increases average order values. Klarna grew from a Swedish checkout button into something considerably more complex. It now holds a banking licence in Sweden, offers savings accounts, issues its own card, and operates across more than 45 markets with around 93 million active consumers and 675,000 merchant partners at the end of 2024. The US, which Klarna entered in 2015, has become its largest market by revenue, a fact the company underlined by listing on the New York Stock Exchange in September 2025 under the ticker KLAR, raising $1.37 billion at IPO. The financial trajectory has been bumpy. Klarna reported net income of $21 million in 2024, a return to profitability after a bruising 2022 that included an 85% valuation cut and significant layoffs that reduced headcount from over 7,000 to around 3,400. What survived the restructuring was a leaner company with $2.81 billion in revenue and a clearer strategic direction: AI. Klarna's partnership with OpenAI produced a customer service assistant it claims handles the equivalent of 700 full-time agents, and generative AI now manages roughly two-thirds of customer chats. The honest assessment of where Klarna sits today: it's no longer purely a BNPL provider and it's not quite a bank. It's somewhere in between, a consumer finance platform that knows more about your shopping behaviour than your bank does, and is betting that's worth a lot.
Founded 2005
View profile →
Monzo
Monzo
WealthDigital BankingLendingPersonal Finance
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
The founding team that built Monzo had all worked together before — at Starling Bank, another challenger startup that didn't survive its internal conflicts. Tom Blomfield, Gary Dolman, Jonas Huckestein, Jason Bates, and Paul Rippon left together in 2015 and started again. The product was initially a prepaid card — a coral-coloured piece of plastic that became one of the most recognisable objects in British fintech — before becoming a fully licensed current account in 2017. The early community was unusual for a bank: public engineering blogs, user forums, beta programmes, and a 2016 crowdfunding round that raised £1 million in 96 seconds, a world record. People felt ownership of the product in a way no high street bank had ever achieved, and that emotional connection became a durable competitive advantage. A decade on, the results have caught up with the mythology. For the year to March 2026, Monzo reported revenue of £1.71 billion, up 39%, with gross profit crossing £1 billion for the first time and a third consecutive year in the black — statutory pre-tax profit of £87.3 million, up 44%, or £172.6 million adjusted for restructuring charges and a roughly £21 million FCA fine over historical financial-crime control failings. The bank added a record three million customers to reach 15.2 million — one in five UK adults — with deposits up 55% to £25.7 billion, 1.6 million paying subscribers, and business banking growing 45% to 905,000 customers and 14% of revenue. Four separate income streams — current account balances, borrowing, payments, and wealth — each now clear £300 million. Half of active customers use Monzo as their primary bank, which shows up in the metric that anchors every valuation conversation: revenue per active personal customer of £167, against Revolut's £66. The gap is the difference between being someone's bank and being their travel card. Leadership and strategy both turned over during the year. Diana Layfield, a former Google executive, took over as CEO in February 2026 following TS Anil's departure — a transition shaped in part by board tensions over IPO venue and the company's UK concentration. Her first significant moves were decisive: Monzo closed its US operations entirely, and redirected the international ambition at Europe, where it secured a banking licence from the Central Bank of Ireland, launched in Ireland to a 100,000-person waitlist, and named Spain as the next market. The acquisition of digital mortgage broker Habito completed on 1 April 2026, giving the bank a capital-efficient route into mortgages — a product more than 550,000 customers were already tracking in the app. Costs rose with the ambition: the cost-to-income ratio ticked up to 74% as hiring and marketing accelerated. Monzo remains private, valued at approximately $5.9 billion in its 2024 secondary sale, and Layfield has told the FT she is "not in a hurry" to list. The strategic bet of this chapter is clear and genuinely contestable: that Monzo's deep-relationship, primary-bank model — expensive to build, lucrative per customer — can be exported to European markets where Revolut arrived a decade earlier with the opposite playbook. The UK numbers say the model works. Europe will say whether it travels.
Founded 2015
View profile →
Tink
Tink
Embedded FinanceFinancial InfrastructureOpen Banking
🇸🇪 Sweden
Daniel Kjellén and Fredrik Hedberg didn't set out to build infrastructure. Tink started in Stockholm in 2012 as a consumer personal finance app — an attempt to give Swedish bank customers a cleaner view of their money across multiple accounts. It was a reasonable idea that ran into an unreasonable obstacle: getting reliable, consistent data out of European banks was extraordinarily hard. The technical problem turned out to be more interesting than the consumer product. In 2018 they pivoted, shifted focus entirely to the B2B layer, and started selling the very infrastructure they'd been forced to build for themselves. That pivot proved prescient. The EU's PSD2 directive, which came into full effect in 2019, legally required banks to open their data to authorised third parties — creating the regulatory foundation that open banking platforms needed to operate at scale. Tink had spent years building exactly those bank connections. When the regulation arrived, the company was ready. The platform Kjellén and Hedberg built connects to more than 3,400 banks and financial institutions across Europe, reaching over 250 million bank customers. Through a single API integration, banks, fintechs, and merchants can access aggregated account data, initiate payments directly from customer bank accounts, verify account ownership, and enrich transaction data — without maintaining their own connections to hundreds of separate banking systems with different technical standards and update schedules. Clients include Klarna, PayPal, NatWest, ABN AMRO, and BNP Paribas Fortis. In March 2022, Visa completed the acquisition of Tink for €1.8 billion — one of the largest European fintech acquisitions of that year, and a clear signal of how seriously the global payments industry had come to take open banking infrastructure. Visa's strategic rationale was straightforward: it had failed to acquire Plaid, the US equivalent, after an antitrust challenge, and needed a European open banking capability. Tink gave it 500 employees, 18 European markets, and relationships with over 300 banks and fintechs built over a decade. The founders stayed on as CEO and CTO through the transition, continuing to run Tink as a standalone Visa subsidiary from Stockholm. Both departed in 2025 — Kjellén and Hedberg announced they were building Freda, a new AI-driven legal and compliance technology startup, with the pair describing Tink as "now in better hands than ever." Francois Tornier, Visa's VP of Open Banking, took over as CEO. The product roadmap has continued under Visa ownership, including a 2024 expansion of Tink's open banking platform into the US market.
Founded 2012
View profile →
Artemundi
Artemundi
Wealth
🇩🇪 Germany
Artemundi is an alternative asset manager built for the modern wealth ecosystem. Rather than chasing traditional markets, the firm specializes in emerging market debt, private equity, and distressed assets—seeking returns where conventional investors see opacity. It's positioned at the intersection of hedge fund sophistication and institutional rigor, attracting wealth managers and sophisticated investors who understand that real returns often live outside the mainstream. The company runs multiple investment vehicles targeting different risk appetites and timeframes, each managed with the discipline of a tier-one institutional shop. Their approach combines deep emerging market expertise with operational rigor, allowing them to navigate complexity that smaller competitors cannot. This isn't retail wealth management repackaged; it's institutional-grade alternative investing for those who can access it. In the European wealth tech landscape, Artemundi represents the alternative asset class gatekeepers—firms that manage substantial capital across non-traditional strategies. While the fintech world obsesses over fractional shares and gamified trading, Artemundi operates in the space where serious capital allocation happens. They cater to family offices, pension funds, and institutional investors who view alternative assets as core portfolio components rather than exotic bets. The firm embodies a particular European investment philosophy: skepticism of index-heavy approaches, appetite for frontier markets, and belief that skilled managers can exploit inefficiencies where passive strategies cannot. In an era of wealth fragmentation and advisor tech disruption, Artemundi remains a destination for institutional-grade alternative returns.
View profile →
DEGIRO
DEGIRO
Wealth
🇳🇱 Netherlands
DEGIRO is a Dutch discount broker built on a single observation: the marginal cost of executing a stock trade is software and settlement, not human labour — so the fees European retail investors were paying bore little relation to what a trade actually cost. Founded in Amsterdam in 2008 by former BinckBank employees, it started as an institutional broker, opened to retail investors in 2013, and undercut the incumbents by a wide enough margin to expand across the continent within a few years. The product is deliberately unglamorous. No gamification, no social feed, no notification congratulating you on a €5 deposit. DEGIRO offers direct access to dozens of exchanges across Europe and the US, real market data, and low per-trade pricing, and it assumes you already know what you want to buy. That utilitarian positioning has aged well as the novelty of investing apps has faded and European retail investors have matured past the onboarding experience into simply wanting to invest efficiently. DEGIRO is no longer independent. German broker flatex AG agreed to acquire it for around €250 million in December 2019, with the legal merger into flatexDEGIRO Bank completing in May 2021. The combined group trades on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, joined the MDAX in March 2025, and converted from an AG to a European Company (SE) at the end of 2025. It now runs three brands — DEGIRO for international European markets, flatex for Germany and Austria, and ViTrade for active traders — together serving more than 3.5 million customers across 16 countries, with over €95 billion in assets under custody and more than 75 million transactions a year. Group revenue reached €559.8 million in 2025 with net income of €160.4 million, up from €71.9 million in 2023. The regulatory record is less tidy than the pricing story. The Dutch AFM fined the bank €2 million in 2022 over late and inaccurate reporting of unusual transactions, reduced to €797,500 on appeal in 2025. BaFin has issued a series of penalties: €1.05 million in 2023 for breaches of banking supervisory rules, accompanied by additional capital requirements and a special representative appointed to oversee remediation; €560,000 in December 2025 for advertising free investment services without clearly disclosing that a processing fee applied; and €1 million in April 2026 for failing to publish inside information promptly. Leadership has churned alongside it — CEO Frank Niehage resigned in 2024 after a public dispute with founder and major shareholder Bernd Förtsch, and former Morgan Stanley Europe CEO Oliver Behrens took over that October.
Founded 2013
View profile →
Koinly
Koinly
RegTechCrypto & Blockchain
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
Koinly started as a weekend project by someone annoyed at his own spreadsheet. Robin Singh, a developer and crypto investor, could not find a tool that handled crypto tax reporting better than the manual workbook he was maintaining himself, so he built one — reportedly reaching a working product within four months of starting in 2018. The framing on the company's own about page has not changed since: crypto taxes shouldn't require a finance degree. That origin explains a great deal about the product, which is unusually focused on the specific mechanical problem of getting scattered transaction data into a shape a tax authority will accept, and unusually indifferent to everything else. The mechanism is straightforward and the coverage is the moat. Users connect exchanges via API, add wallet addresses and blockchains, and Koinly reconstructs the full transaction history, classifies each event, calculates capital gains and income, and generates a country-specific report. The integration count is the headline number — the company claims support for several hundred exchanges, wallets and blockchains, with the figure quoted between 800 and 900 depending on the source — and the event coverage extends well past spot trading into DeFi transactions, staking rewards, liquidity pools, NFTs, mining and airdrops, which is where most competing tools break down. Reports are produced for more than 20 tax jurisdictions with local rules encoded per country, including US forms such as 8949 and the newer 1099-DA, and outputs export into TurboTax, TaxAct and Xero. Accountants are a significant customer segment alongside individual investors, and larger crypto businesses use it too. The company is unusual in this directory for how little of its structure is public. Koinly is generally described as London-headquartered, operating through a Singapore entity, with a distributed team; published employee counts vary wildly across data providers, which is a fairly reliable sign that none of them know. Funding is similarly opaque — a single round is recorded, with KuCoin Labs named among investors, and no disclosed amount or valuation. There was a round of staff cuts reported in December 2022, at the bottom of the crypto winter and immediately before tax season, which is the one visible data point about the business running lean through the cycle. The user base is described as several hundred thousand. What matters more than the corporate opacity is the regulatory ratchet the company now sits on. Since 1 January 2026, DAC8 and the OECD's CARF framework require crypto-asset service providers across the EU to report customer transaction data directly to tax authorities. The era of crypto taxes as voluntary compliance is over: tax offices now receive the data automatically, and the reconciliation burden falls on the individual. That is a structural tailwind for every serious tool in this category, and it sharpens the competitive question. Koinly's position is breadth — the most integrations, the widest jurisdictional coverage, a global rather than regional footprint — against Blockpit, which competes on depth of local tax law in the German-speaking markets and has consolidated two European rivals to get there. Koinly is the generalist; Blockpit is the specialist. Which wins probably depends on whether a user's problem is "I traded on eleven venues across four chains" or "I need this to survive scrutiny from the Austrian tax office."
Founded 2018
View profile →